Accountability in the context of artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the professional practices and legal mechanisms that ensure responsibility for the impacts of AI systems is properly assigned and that adequate remedies are available when harm occurs. This principle emphasizes that those involved in the creation and deployment of AI technologies—such as designers, developers, manufacturers, operators, and users—are answerable for the outcomes of these systems.
The significance of accountability arises from concerns about decisions made by AI systems, especially as these technologies can have far-reaching effects on society and the environment. With AI systems increasingly making autonomous decisions, it's crucial to establish who is responsible when things go wrong. In this context, accountability encompasses various stages of an AI system's lifecycle:
- Design Phase (Pre-Deployment): At this stage, accountability involves ensuring that AI systems are developed with considerations for verifiability, replicability, and environmental responsibility. This may include conducting impact assessments to anticipate potential risks and embedding ethical guidelines into the system's architecture.
- Monitoring Phase (During Deployment): During this phase, ongoing evaluation and auditing are essential to maintain accountability. This could involve implementing evaluation requirements, regular audits, and possibly the creation of monitoring bodies to oversee the AI system's performance and compliance with ethical standards.
- Redress Phase (After Harm Has Occurred): If an AI system causes harm, accountability requires providing mechanisms for individuals to appeal decisions and seek remedies. This includes establishing clear liability and legal responsibility, ensuring that affected parties can obtain justice, and preventing similar issues in the future.
Accountability is closely linked to other ethical principles such as transparency, explainability, safety, and human control over technology. Transparent and explainable AI systems make it easier to attribute responsibility and build public trust. Moreover, emphasizing accountability can help dissipate fears associated with AI by reassuring the public that there are safeguards and recourse options in place.
Importantly, accountability should not be attributed to the AI technology itself but rather apportioned among the humans and organizations involved. This includes recognizing the roles of governments, companies, researchers, developers, and users in contributing to and being responsible for the AI system's actions. The degree of accountability may adapt to the context in which the AI technology is used, acknowledging that different applications may require different accountability frameworks.
In summary, accountability ensures that as AI systems become more integrated into various aspects of society, there are clear and enforceable standards for responsible development, deployment, and oversight. It is a foundational principle that supports the ethical advancement of AI technologies in alignment with societal values and legal norms.
Recommended Reading
Fjeld, Jessica, Nele Achten, Hannah Hilligoss, Adam Nagy, and Madhulika Srikumar. "Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI ." Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, Research Publication No. 2020-1, January 15, 2020.
This article is in the Edition 1.0 Review stage. Additional work is needed. Please use the chat box in the bottom-right corner of the page to recommend improvements.
