This glossary entry is in the Edition 3.0 Review stage. Additional work is needed. Please use the form at the bottom of the page to recommend improvements.
AI & Hiring refers to the application of artificial intelligence technologies in employers' recruitment and selection processes. This involves using algorithms, machine learning, and natural language processing tools to screen resumes, analyze candidate responses, and conduct initial interviews. The primary aims are to streamline the hiring process, enhance efficiency, and potentially reduce human biases by relying on data-driven decisions.
Researchers at the AI Ethics Lab strongly encourage companies not to use AI as the primary tool when it comes to fundamental aspects of a human being's inherent dignity, such as the human right to work.
The practice of using AI in hiring is fraught with issues that can deeply erode a person's dignity and self-worth. AI algorithms that scan and evaluate resumes based on predefined criteria such as experience, skills, and education, can result in discrimination, whether intended or not. AI-driven tools that conduct preliminary interviews assessing candidates' responses, speech patterns, and even facial expressions in video interviews, are deeply concerning, given the privacy concerns that arise when deploying biometrics. Candidates who are ranked by algorithms according to their fit for the role are determined by their performance across various assessment tools, which also may perpetuate biased human resource systems. AI systems are designed to identify and mitigate unconscious biases in the hiring process, promoting diversity and inclusivity, an object that cannot be achieved without a deep network of humans overseeing every stage of the process.
The use of AI in hiring claims to improve efficiency by handling large volumes of applications quickly and identifying top candidates with minimal human intervention. It aims for objectivity by reducing human biases through predefined criteria and data-driven assessments. Additionally, proponents also claim it reduces hiring costs by minimizing the need for extensive human resources during the initial screening phases and enhances candidate fit by matching skills and qualities more precisely with job requirements. This line of thinking is misguided—removing the "human" in human resources is a deeply concerning practice with serious consequences for every stakeholder involved in the hiring process.
Those who use AI in hiring seek to leverage big data to assess candidate information against job requirements. Machine learning algorithms, they claim, continuously improve the selection process based on outcomes and feedback, while natural language processing evaluates candidates' written and verbal communications.
There are numerous ethical, legal, and financial considerations arise with the use of AI in hiring.
- There is a risk of bias amplification, where AI perpetuates or even intensifies existing biases if it learns from biased data, including gender, racial, and socioeconomic biases present in the job market.
- Transparency and accountability are also concerns, as AI-driven processes can become "black boxes," making decisions in ways that neither candidates nor employers fully understand. This lack of transparency raises questions about who is accountable for hiring decisions.
- Privacy concerns emerge from the collection and analysis of candidate data, especially with invasive methods like facial analysis in video interviews.
- Trustworthiness and reputation are at stake if employers rely heavily on AI without ensuring ethical practices; they risk being perceived as untrustworthy or unethical, which can harm their reputation among the public and investors.
While AI & Hiring claims to transform recruitment by making it more efficient and data-driven, it is fraught with ethical challenges, resulting in the removal of the "human" in human resources. Employers are encouraged not to engage in this type of practice. Rather, they must legally guarantee transparency, fairness, and accountability in their AI systems to maintain trust among candidates, employees, and the broader public. Addressing these ethical concerns is not only a matter of regulatory compliance but also a strategic imperative to uphold an employer's reputation and ethical standing in the community. The corporate value of efficiency should never come at the cost of upholding the human right to dignity.
