Skip to content

Rutgers.edu   |   Rutgers Search

Humans First Fund
  • About
    • Students
    • People
    • Our Values
    • Programs
  • Human Rights Index
    • Purpose
    • Human Rights
    • Principles
    • Instruments
    • Sectors
    • Glossary
    • CHARTER
    • Editors’ Desk
  • Project Insight
  • Publications
    • AI & Human Rights Index
    • Moral Imagination
    • Human Rights in Global AI Ecosystems
  • Courses
    • AI & Society
    • AI Ethics & Law
    • AI & Vulnerable Humans
  • News
  • Opportunities
  • About
    • Students
    • People
    • Our Values
    • Programs
  • Human Rights Index
    • Purpose
    • Human Rights
    • Principles
    • Instruments
    • Sectors
    • Glossary
    • CHARTER
    • Editors’ Desk
  • Project Insight
  • Publications
    • AI & Human Rights Index
    • Moral Imagination
    • Human Rights in Global AI Ecosystems
  • Courses
    • AI & Society
    • AI Ethics & Law
    • AI & Vulnerable Humans
  • News
  • Opportunities
  • All
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z

Hallucination

Hallucination in the context of artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the phenomenon where an AI system generates information that is false, nonsensical, or not grounded in the data it was trained on. This can occur across various types of AI models, including those that generate text, images, audio, video, or code. Hallucinations are especially common in language models, where the AI produces responses that may seem coherent but are factually incorrect, or in image-generating models where the outputs contain unrealistic or distorted elements.

Key Features:

  • Output Inaccuracy: The AI produces results that are factually incorrect or irrelevant, which are not based on the data it was trained to process.
  • Context Misinterpretation: Hallucinations often arise when the AI misinterprets ambiguous inputs or lacks the necessary data to provide an accurate response.
  • Model Limitations: The occurrence of hallucinations highlights the limitations in an AI system’s ability to understand complex contexts or handle novel input, often pointing to gaps or biases in the training data.

Implications for Ethics:

  • Misinformation: AI hallucinations can inadvertently spread misinformation, potentially leading to confusion or the dissemination of false information.
  • Trust and Reliability: Frequent hallucinations in AI outputs can undermine the reliability and trustworthiness of AI systems, particularly in applications where accuracy is critical, such as healthcare, legal systems, or journalism.
  • User Manipulation: There is a risk of users intentionally provoking AI systems to hallucinate for malicious purposes, such as spreading disinformation or creating confusion.

Challenges:

  • Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations: Developing effective methods for identifying and correcting hallucinations in AI outputs remains a key challenge. Automated detection techniques are still in development to improve system accuracy.
  • Training Data Quality: Hallucinations are often linked to biases, inaccuracies, or gaps in the training data. Ensuring diverse, high-quality, and representative data is crucial to reducing the occurrence of hallucinations.
  • Model Design: Enhancing AI model architecture and training methods is necessary to minimize hallucinations. Improvements in AI design will focus on better handling ambiguous or incomplete inputs.

Future Directions:

Addressing AI hallucinations is an important area of ongoing research. Key efforts focus on improving model robustness, refining training datasets, and developing advanced methods for detecting and correcting erroneous outputs. As AI systems become more integrated into everyday life and critical industries, ensuring their accuracy and reliability will remain a vital ethical concern.

 


Disclaimer: Our global network of contributors to the AI & Human Rights Index is currently writing these articles and glossary entries. This particular page is currently in the recruitment and research stage. Please return later to see where this page is in the editorial workflow. Thank you! We look forward to learning with and from you.

  • Rutgers.edu
  • New Brunswick
  • Newark
  • Camden
  • Rutgers Health
  • Online
  • Rutgers Search
About
  • Mission
  • Values
  • People
  • Courses
  • Programs
  • News
  • Opportunities
  • Style Guide
Human Rights Index
  • Purpose
  • Human Rights
  • Principles
  • Sectors
  • Glossary
Project Insight
Moral Imagination
Humans First Fund

Dr. Nathan C. Walker
Principal Investigator, AI Ethics Lab

Rutgers University-Camden
College of Arts & Sciences
Department of Philosophy & Religion

AI Ethics Lab at the Digital Studies Center
Cooper Library in Johnson Park
101 Cooper St, Camden, NJ 08102

Copyright ©2025, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Rutgers is an equal access/equal opportunity institution. Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to direct suggestions, comments, or complaints concerning any accessibility issues with Rutgers websites to accessibility@rutgers.edu or complete the Report Accessibility Barrier / Provide Feedback Form.