Bias in artificial intelligence refers to systematic unfairness or prejudice in an AI system’s outputs. It can arise from flawed training data (data bias), unintended algorithmic rules (algorithmic bias), or human reinforcement of pre-existing assumptions (confirmation bias).
This issue is central to AI ethics and law because bias can lead to discrimination, erode public trust, and violate human rights. Unrepresentative datasets may cause an AI to favor certain groups over others, while algorithms designed without considering different populations risk harmful outcomes. Since an AI lacks moral agency, developers, organizations, and regulators must be held accountable for preventing unfair results.
Common mitigation strategies include using diverse, high-quality data, regularly auditing models for skewed predictions, and employing explainable AI methods to illuminate decision processes. Equally important are social measures—such as inclusive design teams and transparent oversight—that address systemic inequalities driving bias. Continuously monitoring AI systems throughout their lifecycle helps maintain equitable performance as social and data environments evolve.
By actively detecting and correcting bias, stakeholders ensure AI promotes fairness and safeguards individual dignity, aligning technology with ethical standards. Ultimately, bias is a human responsibility, making it essential for developers and institutions to foster accountability and ensure AI upholds human rights.
Disclaimer: Our global network of contributors to the AI & Human Rights Index is currently writing these articles and glossary entries. This particular page is currently in the recruitment and research stage. Please return later to see where this page is in the editorial workflow. Thank you! We look forward to learning with and from you.
