Explainability means an AI system can show how it reached a decision in a way people can understand. It focuses on making the AI’s reasoning transparent and clear to humans, providing understandable reasons for the system’s outputs.
Explainability is crucial in AI ethics because it builds user trust. When people can understand how an AI makes decisions, they are more likely to accept those decisions. It also helps ensure fairness and accountability, since clear explanations can reveal if a system is treating individuals without bias or discrimination. In high-stakes areas like healthcare, finance, or criminal justice, being able to explain AI decisions allows for human oversight—experts can review and question an AI’s outcome, which helps prevent errors and injustices.
Explainability of AI has a strong link to human rights and law. If an automated system makes a decision that significantly affects someone’s life, that person has a right to understand why the decision was made. This ties into basic principles of justice and individual autonomy: people should maintain control over decisions made about them, especially when personal data is involved. Many policies and regulations now insist on transparency in automated decision-making to protect these rights and values.
For example, explainable AI may give people the ability to question significant automated decisions and seek a human review. This means companies deploying AI must be ready to explain their algorithms’ outcomes, ensuring that responsibility lies with the humans and organizations behind the AI rather than the technology itself.
Many advanced AI models act like black boxes, meaning their inner workings are hard for anyone to understand. To address this, researchers have developed techniques to make AI decisions clearer. One approach is feature importance, which highlights the key factors that influenced the AI’s decision. Another method uses model-agnostic tools, which can explain any AI model by simplifying its behavior into human-understandable terms. A different strategy is designing rule-based systems (like decision trees), which are transparent by nature because they follow clear, interpretable rules.
Recommended Reading
Jessica Fjeld, Nele Achten, Hannah Hilligoss, Adam Nagy, and Madhulika Srikumar. "Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI ." Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, Research Publication No. 2020-1, January 15, 2020.
Disclaimer: Our global network of contributors to the AI & Human Rights Index is currently writing these articles and glossary entries. This particular page is currently in the recruitment and research stage. Please return later to see where this page is in the editorial workflow. Thank you! We look forward to learning with and from you.
