Our global network of contributors to the AI & Human Rights Index is currently writing these articles and glossary entries. This particular page is currently in the recruitment and research stage. Please return later to see where this page is in the editorial workflow. Thank you! We look forward to learning with and from you.

[Insert statement of urgency and significance for why this right relates to AI.]

Sectors #

The contributors of the AI & Human Rights Index have identified the following sectors as responsible for both using AI to protect and advance this human right.

• ART: Arts and Culture
  The Arts and Culture sector encompasses organizations, institutions, and individuals involved in the creation, preservation, and promotion of artistic and cultural expressions. This includes content creators, the entertainment industry, historical documentation centers, cultural institutions, museums, and arts organizations. The ART sector plays a vital role in enriching societies, fostering creativity, preserving heritage, and promoting cultural diversity and understanding.

  ART-CRT: Content Creators

  Content Creators are individuals or groups who produce artistic or cultural works, including visual artists, musicians, writers, filmmakers, and digital creators. They contribute to the cultural landscape by expressing ideas, emotions, and narratives through various mediums. These creators are accountable for using AI ethically in their creative processes and in how they distribute and monetize their work. This involves respecting intellectual property rights, avoiding plagiarism facilitated by AI, and ensuring that AI-generated content does not perpetuate stereotypes or infringe on cultural sensitivities. By integrating ethical AI practices, content creators can enhance their creativity while upholding artistic integrity and cultural respect. Examples include using AI tools for music composition or visual art creation as a means of inspiration, while ensuring the final work is original and not infringing on others' rights. Employing AI to analyze audience engagement data to tailor content that resonates with diverse audiences without compromising artistic vision or reinforcing harmful biases.

  ART-ENT: Entertainment Industry

  The Entertainment Industry comprises companies and professionals involved in the production, distribution, and promotion of entertainment content, such as films, television shows, music, and live performances. This industry significantly influences culture and public opinion. These entities are accountable for using AI ethically in content creation, marketing, and distribution. They must prevent the use of AI in ways that could lead to deepfakes, unauthorized use of likenesses, or manipulation of audiences. Ethical AI use can enhance production efficiency and audience engagement while protecting individual rights and promoting responsible content. Examples include implementing AI for special effects in films that respect performers' rights and obtain necessary consents. Using AI algorithms for content recommendations that promote diversity and avoid creating echo chambers or reinforcing stereotypes.

  ART-HDC: Historical Documentation Centers

  Historical Documentation Centers are institutions that collect, preserve, and provide access to historical records, archives, and artifacts. They play a crucial role in safeguarding cultural heritage and supporting research. These centers are accountable for using AI ethically to digitize and manage collections while respecting the provenance of artifacts and the rights of communities connected to them. They must ensure that AI does not misrepresent historical information or contribute to cultural appropriation. Examples include employing AI for digitizing and cataloging archives, making them more accessible to the public and researchers while ensuring accurate representation. Using AI to restore or reconstruct historical artifacts or documents, respecting the original context and cultural significance.

  ART-INS: Cultural Institutions

  Cultural Institutions include organizations such as libraries, theaters, cultural centers, and galleries that promote cultural activities and education. They foster community engagement and cultural appreciation. These institutions are accountable for using AI ethically to enhance visitor experiences, manage collections, and promote inclusivity. They must prevent biases in AI applications that could exclude or misrepresent certain cultures or communities. Examples include implementing AI-powered interactive exhibits that engage visitors of all backgrounds. Using AI analytics to understand visitor demographics and preferences, informing programming that is inclusive and representative of diverse cultures.

  ART-MUS: Museums

  Museums are institutions that collect, preserve, and exhibit artifacts of artistic, cultural, historical, or scientific significance. They educate the public and contribute to cultural preservation. Museums are accountable for using AI ethically in curation, exhibition design, and visitor engagement. This includes respecting the cultural heritage of artifacts, obtaining proper consents for use, and ensuring that AI does not distort interpretations. Examples include using AI to create virtual reality experiences that allow visitors to explore exhibits remotely, expanding access while ensuring accurate representation. Employing AI for artifact preservation techniques, such as predicting degradation and optimizing conservation efforts.

  ART-ORG: Arts Organizations

  Arts Organizations are groups that support artists and promote the arts through funding, advocacy, education, and community programs. They play a key role in fostering artistic expression and cultural development. These organizations are accountable for using AI ethically to support artists and audiences equitably. They must ensure that AI tools do not introduce biases in grant allocations, program selections, or audience targeting. Examples include utilizing AI to analyze grant applications objectively, ensuring fair consideration for artists from diverse backgrounds. Implementing AI-driven marketing strategies that reach wider audiences without infringing on privacy or perpetuating stereotypes.

  Summary

  By embracing ethical AI practices, each of these sectors can significantly contribute to the prevention of human rights abuses and the advancement of human rights in arts and culture. Their accountability lies in the responsible development, deployment, and oversight of AI technologies to enhance creativity, preserve cultural heritage, promote diversity, and ensure that artistic expressions respect the rights and dignity of all individuals and communities.  

  ---

  Disclaimer: Our global network of contributors to the AI & Human Rights Index is currently writing these articles and glossary entries. This particular page is currently in the research and review stage. Please return later to see where this page is in the editorial workflow. Thank you! We look forward to learning with and from you.

• BUS: Business Sectors
  The Business Sectors encompass a wide range of industries and enterprises engaged in commercial, industrial, and professional activities. This includes agriculture industries, the automotive industry, corporations and enterprises, energy companies, financial services, gig economy platforms, manufacturing industries, marketing and advertising firms, pharmaceutical companies, retail companies, small and medium-sized enterprises, service industries, and technology companies. The BUS sector plays a significant role in economic development, job creation, innovation, and the provision of goods and services that meet societal needs.

  BUS-AGR: Agriculture Industries

  Agriculture Industries involve the cultivation of crops, raising of livestock, and production of food and raw materials. This sector is fundamental to food security and the sustenance of populations worldwide. These industries are accountable for using AI ethically to enhance productivity, sustainability, and resilience while respecting environmental and human rights. They must ensure that AI applications do not lead to unfair labor practices, environmental degradation, or exploitation of small-scale farmers. Examples include implementing AI-powered precision agriculture techniques that optimize resource use, reduce waste, and minimize environmental impact without displacing workers unjustly. Using AI to forecast weather patterns and crop diseases, supporting farmers in making informed decisions while ensuring access to technology for smallholders.

  BUS-AUT: Automotive Industry

  The Automotive Industry encompasses companies involved in the design, manufacture, marketing, and sale of motor vehicles. This sector is integral to transportation and has significant economic and environmental implications. These companies are accountable for using AI ethically in vehicle development, manufacturing processes, and customer interactions. They must ensure that AI technologies, such as autonomous driving systems, are safe, reliable, and respect user privacy and safety standards. Examples include developing AI-driven autonomous vehicles with robust safety measures, thoroughly tested to prevent accidents and protect passengers and pedestrians. Using AI in manufacturing to improve efficiency and product quality without violating labor rights or displacing workers without fair transition support.

  BUS-COR: Corporations and Enterprises

  Corporations and Enterprises are large businesses operating in various industries, providing goods and services on a national or global scale. They have substantial influence on economies, employment, and societal trends. These entities are accountable for integrating ethical AI practices across their operations, from supply chain management to customer engagement. They must prevent AI-driven decisions that could lead to discrimination, privacy violations, or environmental harm. Examples include using AI for supply chain optimization that ensures ethical sourcing and transparency, avoiding suppliers involved in labor abuses. Implementing AI in customer service to enhance user experience while protecting personal data and avoiding biased interactions.

  BUS-ENE: Energy Companies

  Energy Companies are involved in the production, distribution, and sale of energy, including fossil fuels, electricity, and renewable energy sources. They play a critical role in powering economies and impacting environmental sustainability. These companies are accountable for using AI ethically to optimize energy production and consumption while reducing environmental impact. They must prevent AI applications from contributing to environmental degradation or infringing on community rights. Examples include utilizing AI for predictive maintenance of equipment to prevent accidents and environmental spills. Implementing AI systems to manage energy grids efficiently, integrating renewable energy sources and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

  BUS-FIN: Financial Services

  Financial Services include institutions that manage money, provide banking services, insurance, investment, and facilitate financial transactions. They are essential for economic stability and growth. These institutions are accountable for using AI ethically in financial decision-making, customer interactions, and risk management. They must prevent discriminatory practices, protect customer data, and promote financial inclusion. Examples include employing AI algorithms for credit scoring that are transparent and free from biases, ensuring fair access to loans. Using AI in fraud detection to protect customers without infringing on privacy or unfairly targeting certain groups.

  BUS-GIG: Gig Economy Platforms

  Gig Economy Platforms are digital marketplaces that connect freelancers or contractors with clients for short-term work or services. They have transformed traditional employment models. These platforms are accountable for using AI ethically to manage work allocation, compensation, and worker evaluations. They must ensure fair treatment of gig workers, prevent exploitation, and protect their rights. Examples include implementing AI systems that distribute work opportunities equitably among workers. Using AI to set fair pricing for services, avoiding algorithms that depress wages or create unfair competition.

  BUS-MAN: Manufacturing Industries

  Manufacturing Industries produce goods using labor, machines, tools, and chemical or biological processing. They are a cornerstone of economic development and innovation. These industries are accountable for using AI ethically in production processes, ensuring worker safety, and environmental stewardship. They must prevent job displacement without support, unsafe working conditions, or environmental harm due to AI implementations. Examples include using AI-powered robots to enhance production efficiency while retraining workers for new roles, avoiding mass layoffs. Implementing AI for quality control to reduce waste and defects, contributing to sustainable manufacturing practices.

  BUS-MKT: Marketing and Advertising Firms

  Marketing and Advertising Firms specialize in promoting products and services to consumers. They influence consumer behavior and market trends. These firms are accountable for using AI ethically in targeting, data collection, and content creation. They must respect consumer privacy, avoid manipulative practices, and prevent the spread of misinformation. Examples include using AI for personalized advertising that respects user consent and privacy preferences. Implementing AI analytics to understand consumer needs without exploiting vulnerabilities or reinforcing harmful stereotypes.

  BUS-PHC: Pharmaceutical Companies

  Pharmaceutical Companies research, develop, produce, and market drugs and medical devices. They contribute to healthcare advancements and public health. These companies are accountable for using AI ethically in drug discovery, clinical trials, and marketing. They must ensure patient safety, data privacy, and avoid biases that could affect treatment accessibility. Examples include employing AI to accelerate drug discovery processes while ensuring clinical trials are inclusive and representative. Using AI to monitor drug safety post-market, protecting patient health by identifying adverse effects promptly.

  BUS-RET: Retail Companies

  Retail Companies sell goods and services directly to consumers through physical stores or online platforms. They impact consumer choices and economic activity. These companies are accountable for using AI ethically in customer service, inventory management, and marketing. They must protect consumer data, avoid discriminatory pricing or services, and ensure fair labor practices in supply chains. Examples include implementing AI for personalized shopping experiences while safeguarding customer privacy. Using AI in supply chain management to ensure products are sourced ethically and sustainably.

  BUS-SME: Small and Medium-sized Enterprises

  Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) are businesses with a limited scale in terms of employees and revenue. They are vital for economic diversity and community development. SMEs are accountable for adopting AI ethically to enhance competitiveness without compromising ethical standards. They must ensure that AI use respects customer rights, employee well-being, and legal obligations. Examples include using AI chatbots to improve customer service accessibility while ensuring interactions are respectful and data is protected. Implementing AI tools to optimize operations, supporting business growth without reducing workforce unfairly.

  BUS-SVC: Service Industries

  Service Industries provide intangible goods like healthcare, hospitality, finance, education, and entertainment. They are essential for societal functioning and quality of life. These industries are accountable for using AI ethically to enhance service delivery, customer satisfaction, and operational efficiency. They must prevent biases, protect personal data, and ensure accessibility. Examples include using AI in healthcare for patient diagnostics, ensuring accuracy and avoiding biases that could affect treatment. Implementing AI in hospitality to personalize guest experiences while respecting privacy and cultural sensitivities.

  BUS-TECH: Technology Companies

  Technology Companies develop and sell technology products or services, including software, hardware, and IT solutions. They drive innovation and digital transformation. These companies are accountable for ensuring that AI technologies are developed and deployed ethically, promoting transparency, fairness, and accountability. They must prevent biases in AI algorithms, protect user data, and consider societal impacts. Examples include creating AI applications that are transparent and explainable, allowing users to understand and challenge decisions. Implementing robust security measures in AI products to protect against misuse or cyber threats.

  Summary

  By embracing ethical AI practices, each of these sectors can significantly contribute to the prevention of human rights abuses and the advancement of human rights in the business domain. Their accountability lies in the responsible development, deployment, and oversight of AI technologies to foster innovation, drive economic growth, and meet societal needs while safeguarding individual rights, promoting fairness, and ensuring sustainable practices.  

  ---

  Disclaimer: Our global network of contributors to the AI & Human Rights Index is currently writing these articles and glossary entries. This particular page is currently in the research and review stage. Please return later to see where this page is in the editorial workflow. Thank you! We look forward to learning with and from you.

• COM: Media and Communication
  The Media and Communication sector encompasses organizations, platforms, and individuals involved in the creation, dissemination, and exchange of information and content. This includes content creators, arts and entertainment entities, news and media organizations, publishing and recording media, publishing industries, social media platforms, and telecommunications companies. The COM sector plays a crucial role in shaping public discourse, informing societies, and fostering connectivity, thereby influencing cultural, social, and political landscapes.

  COM-CRT: Content Creators

  Content Creators are individuals or groups who produce original content across various mediums, including writing, audio, video, and digital formats. They contribute to the diversity of information and entertainment available to the public. These creators are accountable for using AI ethically in content creation and distribution. This involves ensuring that AI tools do not infringe on intellectual property rights, propagate misinformation, or perpetuate biases and stereotypes. By integrating ethical AI practices, content creators can enhance creativity and reach while maintaining integrity and respecting audience rights. Examples include using AI for editing and enhancing content, such as automated video editing software, while ensuring that the final product is original and respects copyright laws. Employing AI analytics to understand audience engagement and tailor content without manipulating or exploiting user data.

  COM-ENT: Arts and Entertainment

  The Arts and Entertainment sector includes organizations and individuals involved in producing and distributing artistic and entertainment content, such as films, music, theater, and performances. This sector significantly influences culture and societal values. These entities are accountable for using AI ethically in content production, distribution, and marketing. They must prevent the misuse of AI in creating deepfakes, unauthorized use of individuals' likenesses, or generating content that spreads harmful stereotypes. Ethical AI use can enhance production efficiency and audience engagement while promoting responsible content. Examples include implementing AI for special effects in films that respect performers' rights and obtain necessary consents. Using AI algorithms for content recommendations that promote diversity and avoid reinforcing biases or creating echo chambers.

  COM-NMO: News and Media Organizations

  News and Media Organizations are entities that gather, produce, and distribute news and information to the public through various channels, including print, broadcast, and digital media. They play a critical role in informing the public and shaping public opinion. These organizations are accountable for using AI ethically in news gathering, content curation, and dissemination. This includes preventing the spread of misinformation, ensuring fairness and accuracy, and avoiding biases in AI-driven news algorithms. They must also respect privacy rights in data collection and protect journalistic integrity. Examples include using AI to automate fact-checking processes, enhancing the accuracy of reporting. Implementing AI algorithms for personalized news feeds that provide balanced perspectives and avoid creating filter bubbles.

  COM-PRM: Publishing and Recording Media

  Publishing and Recording Media entities are involved in producing and distributing written, audio, and visual content, including books, music recordings, podcasts, and other media formats. They support artists and authors in reaching audiences. These entities are accountable for using AI ethically in content production, distribution, and rights management. They must respect intellectual property rights, ensure fair compensation for creators, and prevent unauthorized reproduction or distribution facilitated by AI. Examples include employing AI to convert books into audiobooks using synthetic voices, ensuring that proper licenses and consents are obtained. Using AI to detect and prevent piracy or unauthorized sharing of digital content.

  COM-PUB: Publishing Industries

  The Publishing Industries focus on producing and disseminating literature, academic works, and informational content across various platforms. They contribute to education, culture, and the preservation of knowledge. These industries are accountable for using AI ethically in editing, production, and distribution processes. They must prevent biases in AI tools used for content selection or editing that could marginalize certain voices or perspectives. They should also respect authors' rights and ensure that AI does not infringe on intellectual property. Examples include using AI for manuscript editing and proofreading, enhancing efficiency while ensuring that the author's voice and intent are preserved. Implementing AI to recommend books to readers, promoting a diverse range of authors and topics.

  COM-SMP: Social Media Platforms

  Social Media Platforms are online services that enable users to create and share content or participate in social networking. They have a significant impact on communication, information dissemination, and social interaction. These platforms are accountable for using AI ethically in content moderation, recommendation algorithms, and advertising. They must prevent the spread of misinformation, hate speech, and harmful content, protect user data, and avoid algorithmic biases that could lead to echo chambers or discrimination. Examples include using AI to detect and remove harmful content such as harassment or incitement to violence while respecting freedom of expression. Implementing transparent algorithms that provide diverse content and prevent the reinforcement of biases.

  COM-TEL: Telecommunications Companies

  Telecommunications Companies provide communication services such as telephone, internet, and data transmission. They build and maintain the infrastructure that enables connectivity and digital communication globally. These companies are accountable for using AI ethically to manage networks, improve services, and protect user data. They must ensure that AI applications do not infringe on privacy rights, enable unlawful surveillance, or discriminate against certain users. Examples include employing AI to optimize network performance, enhancing service quality without accessing or exploiting user communications. Using AI-driven security measures to protect networks from cyber threats while respecting legal obligations regarding data privacy.

  Summary

  By embracing ethical AI practices, each of these sectors can significantly contribute to the prevention of human rights abuses and the advancement of human rights in media and communication. Their accountability lies in the responsible development, deployment, and oversight of AI technologies to enhance information dissemination, foster connectivity, and enrich cultural experiences while safeguarding individual rights, promoting diversity, and ensuring accurate and fair communication.  

  ---

    Disclaimer: Our global network of contributors to the AI & Human Rights Index is currently writing these articles and glossary entries. This particular page is currently in the research and review stage. Please return later to see where this page is in the editorial workflow. Thank you! We look forward to learning with and from you.

• EDU: Education and Research
  The Education and Research sector encompasses institutions and organizations dedicated to teaching, learning, and scholarly investigation. This includes schools, universities, research institutes, and think tanks. The EDU sector plays a pivotal role in advancing knowledge, fostering innovation, and shaping the minds of future generations.

  EDU-INS: Educational Institutions

  Educational Institutions include schools, colleges, and universities that provide formal education to students at various levels. They are responsible for delivering curricula, facilitating learning, and nurturing critical thinking skills. The EDU-INS sector is accountable for ensuring that AI is used ethically within educational settings. This commitment involves promoting equitable access to AI resources, protecting student data privacy, and preventing biases in AI-driven educational tools. By integrating ethical considerations into their use of AI, they can enhance learning outcomes while safeguarding students' rights. Examples include implementing AI-powered personalized learning platforms that adapt to individual student needs without compromising their privacy. Another example is using AI to detect and mitigate biases in educational materials, ensuring fair representation of diverse perspectives.

  EDU-RES: Research Organizations

  Research Organizations comprise universities, laboratories, and independent institutes engaged in scientific and scholarly research. They contribute to the advancement of knowledge across various fields, including AI and machine learning. These organizations are accountable for conducting AI research responsibly, adhering to ethical guidelines, and considering the societal implications of their work. They must ensure that their research does not contribute to human rights abuses and instead advances human welfare. Examples include conducting interdisciplinary research on AI ethics to inform policy and practice. Developing AI technologies that address social challenges, such as healthcare disparities or environmental sustainability, while ensuring that these technologies are accessible and do not exacerbate inequalities.

  EDU-POL: Educational Policy Makers

  Educational Policy Makers include government agencies, educational boards, and regulatory bodies that develop policies and standards for the education sector. They shape the educational landscape through legislation, funding, and oversight. They are accountable for creating policies that promote the ethical use of AI in education and research. This includes establishing guidelines for data privacy, equity in access to AI resources, and integration of AI ethics into curricula. Examples include drafting regulations that protect student data collected by AI tools, ensuring it is used appropriately and securely. Mandating the inclusion of AI ethics courses in educational programs to prepare students for responsible AI development and use.

  EDU-TEC: Educational Technology Providers

  Educational Technology Providers are companies and organizations that develop and supply technological tools and platforms for education. They create software, hardware, and AI applications that support teaching and learning processes. These providers are accountable for designing AI educational tools that are ethical, inclusive, and respect users' rights. They must prevent biases in AI algorithms, protect user data, and ensure their products do not inadvertently harm or disadvantage any group. Examples include developing AI-driven learning apps that are accessible to students with disabilities, adhering to universal design principles. Implementing robust data security measures to protect sensitive information collected through educational platforms.

  EDU-FND: Educational Foundations and NGOs

  Educational Foundations and NGOs are non-profit organizations focused on improving education systems and outcomes. They often support educational initiatives, fund research, and advocate for policy changes. They are accountable for promoting ethical AI practices in education through funding, advocacy, and program implementation. They can influence the sector by supporting projects that prioritize human rights and ethical considerations in AI. Examples include funding research on the impacts of AI in education to inform best practices. Advocating for policies that ensure equitable access to AI technologies in under-resourced schools, bridging the digital divide.

  Summary

  By embracing ethical AI practices, each of these sectors can significantly contribute to the prevention of human rights abuses and the advancement of human rights in education. Their accountability lies in the responsible development, deployment, and oversight of AI technologies to enhance learning while safeguarding the rights and dignity of all learners.  

  ---

  Disclaimer: Our global network of contributors to the AI & Human Rights Index is currently writing these articles and glossary entries. This particular page is currently in the research and review stage. Please return later to see where this page is in the editorial workflow. Thank you! We look forward to learning with and from you.

• GOV: Government and Public Sector
  The Government and Public Sector encompasses all institutions and organizations that are part of the governmental framework at the local, regional, and national levels. This includes government agencies, civil registration services, economic planning bodies, public officials, public services, regulatory bodies, and government surveillance entities. The GOV sector is responsible for creating and implementing policies, providing public services, and upholding the rule of law. It plays a vital role in shaping society, promoting the welfare of citizens, and ensuring the effective functioning of the state.

  GOV-AGY: Government Agencies

  Government Agencies are administrative units of the government responsible for specific functions such as health, education, transportation, and environmental protection. They implement laws, deliver public services, and regulate various sectors. The GOV-AGY sector is accountable for ensuring that AI is used ethically in public administration. This includes promoting transparency, protecting citizens' data, and preventing biases in AI systems that could lead to unfair treatment. By integrating ethical AI practices, government agencies can enhance service delivery while upholding human rights. Examples include using AI-powered chatbots to improve citizen access to information and services while ensuring data privacy and security. Implementing AI in processing applications or claims efficiently, without discriminating against any group based on race, gender, or socioeconomic status.

  GOV-CRS: Civil Registration Services

  Civil Registration Services are responsible for recording vital events such as births, deaths, marriages, and divorces. They maintain official records essential for legal identity and access to services. These services are accountable for using AI ethically to manage and protect personal data. They must ensure that AI systems used in data processing do not compromise the privacy or security of individuals' sensitive information. Ethical AI use can improve accuracy and efficiency in maintaining civil records. Examples include employing AI to detect and correct errors in civil records, ensuring that individuals' legal identities are accurately reflected. Using AI to streamline the registration process, making it more accessible while safeguarding personal data against unauthorized access.

  GOV-ECN: Economic Planning Bodies

  Economic Planning Bodies are government entities that develop strategies for economic growth, resource allocation, and development policies. They analyze economic data to inform decision-making and promote national prosperity. The GOV-ECN sector is accountable for using AI in economic planning ethically. This involves ensuring that AI models do not perpetuate economic disparities or exclude marginalized communities from development benefits. By applying ethical AI, they can promote inclusive and sustainable economic growth. Examples include utilizing AI for economic forecasting to make informed policy decisions that benefit all segments of society. Implementing AI to assess the potential impact of economic policies on different demographics, thereby promoting equity and reducing inequality.

  GOV-PPM: Public Officials

  Public Officials include elected representatives and appointed officers who hold positions of authority within the government. They are responsible for making decisions, enacting laws, and overseeing the implementation of policies. Public officials are accountable for promoting the ethical use of AI in governance. They must ensure that AI technologies are used to enhance democratic processes, increase transparency, and protect citizens' rights. Their leadership is crucial in setting ethical standards and regulations for AI deployment. Examples include advocating for legislation that regulates AI use to prevent abuses such as mass surveillance or algorithmic discrimination. Using AI tools to engage with constituents more effectively, such as sentiment analysis on public feedback, while ensuring that such tools respect privacy and free speech rights.

  GOV-PUB: Public Services

  Public Services encompass various services provided by the government to its citizens, including healthcare, education, transportation, and public safety. These services aim to meet the needs of the public and improve quality of life. The GOV-PUB sector is accountable for integrating AI into public services ethically. This involves ensuring equitable access, preventing biases, and protecting user data. Ethical AI use can enhance service efficiency and effectiveness while respecting human rights. Examples include deploying AI in public healthcare systems to predict disease outbreaks and allocate resources efficiently, without compromising patient confidentiality. Using AI in public transportation to optimize routes and schedules, improving accessibility while safeguarding passenger data.

  GOV-REG: Regulatory Bodies

  Regulatory Bodies are government agencies tasked with overseeing specific industries or activities to ensure compliance with laws and regulations. They protect public interests by enforcing standards and addressing misconduct. These bodies are accountable for regulating the ethical use of AI across various sectors. They must develop guidelines and enforce compliance to prevent AI-related abuses, such as discrimination or privacy violations. Their role is critical in setting the framework for responsible AI deployment. Examples include establishing regulations that require transparency in AI algorithms used by companies, ensuring they do not discriminate against consumers. Monitoring and auditing AI systems to verify compliance with data protection laws and ethical standards.

  GOV-SUR: Government Surveillance

  Government Surveillance entities are responsible for monitoring activities for purposes such as national security, law enforcement, and public safety. They collect and analyze data to detect and prevent criminal activities and threats. The GOV-SUR sector is accountable for ensuring that AI used in surveillance respects human rights, including the rights to privacy and freedom of expression. They must balance security objectives with individual freedoms, adhering to legal frameworks and ethical standards. Examples include implementing AI-driven surveillance systems with strict oversight to prevent misuse and unauthorized access. Employing AI for specific, targeted investigations with appropriate warrants and legal processes, avoiding mass surveillance practices that infringe on citizens' rights.

  Summary

  By embracing ethical AI practices, each of these sectors can significantly contribute to the prevention of human rights abuses and the advancement of human rights within government and public services. Their accountability lies in the responsible development, deployment, and oversight of AI technologies to enhance governance, protect citizens, and promote transparency and fairness in public administration.  

  ---

  Disclaimer: Our global network of contributors to the AI & Human Rights Index is currently writing these articles and glossary entries. This particular page is currently in the research and review stage. Please return later to see where this page is in the editorial workflow. Thank you! We look forward to learning with and from you.

AI’s Potential Violations #

[Insert 300- to 500-word analysis of how AI could violate this human right.]

AI’s Potential Benefits #

[Insert 300- to 500-word analysis of how AI could advance this human right.]

Human Rights Instruments #

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) #

G.A. Res. 217 (III) A, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, U.N. Doc. A/RES/217(III) (Dec. 10, 1948)

Article 2

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, Trust

Trust in artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the confidence users and stakeholders have in the reliability, safety, and ethical integrity of AI systems. It is a foundational principle in AI ethics and governance, essential for public acceptance and the responsible integration of AI technologies into society. Building trust requires AI systems to demonstrate transparency, fairness, and accountability throughout their design, deployment, and operation. A trustworthy AI system must consistently meet user expectations, deliver reliable outcomes, and align with societal values and norms. Trust extends beyond technical functionality to encompass ethical design principles and governance frameworks. Reliable and safe operation, protection of user privacy, and harm prevention are critical for fostering trust. Transparent and explainable systems enable users to understand AI decision-making processes, while fairness and non-discrimination ensure that AI does not perpetuate biases. Trust-building measures, such as certification processes (e.g., "Certificate of Fairness"), stakeholder engagement, and multi-stakeholder dialogues, play an important role in addressing diverse concerns and expectations. However, trust must be balanced with informed skepticism to prevent blind reliance on AI, especially in high-stakes applications like healthcare, law enforcement, and finance. Over-reliance on AI can lead to unintended consequences, including ethical lapses and harm. Maintaining trust requires continuous monitoring, robust accountability mechanisms, and adaptive governance structures to address emerging challenges and evolving technologies. Trust in AI is not a static attribute but an ongoing process. It necessitates collaboration among developers, users, and regulators to uphold ethical standards, protect societal values, and ensure that AI systems serve humanity responsibly and equitably. Recommended Reading Jessica Fjeld, Nele Achten, Hannah Hilligoss, Adam Nagy, and Madhulika Srikumar. "Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI ." Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, Research Publication No. 2020-1, January 15, 2020.  

---

Disclaimer: Our global network of contributors to the AI & Human Rights Index is currently writing these articles and glossary entries. This particular page is currently in the recruitment and research stage. Please return later to see where this page is in the editorial workflow. Thank you! We look forward to learning with and from you.

, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 26

3. Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1963) #

G.A. Res. 1904 (XVIII), United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, U.N. Doc. A/RES/1904(XVIII) (Nov. 20, 1963)

Article 5

In compliance with the fundamental obligations laid down in article 2 of this Convention, States Parties undertake to prohibit and to eliminate racial discrimination in all its forms and to guarantee the right of everyone, without distinction as to race, colour, or national or ethnic origin, to Equality

Disclaimer: Our global network of contributors to the AI & Human Rights Index is currently writing these articles and glossary entries. This particular page is currently in the recruitment and research stage. Please return later to see where this page is in the editorial workflow. Thank you! We look forward to learning with and from you.

before the law, notably in the enjoyment of the following rights:

(d) Other civil rights, in particular:

(vii) The right to Freedom

Freedom means having the autonomy to make choices and act without undue interference or coercion from others. In the context of artificial intelligence (AI) and human rights, it highlights each person’s right to self-determination and control over their own life and personal data, even as AI systems increasingly influence our daily decisions. Freedom is a cornerstone of human rights and a foundational principle in AI ethics, ensuring that technology upholds individual autonomy rather than undermining it. The rise of AI has a direct impact on fundamental freedoms—from freedom of expression online to the right to privacy—making it crucial that AI is developed and used in ways that respect and protect these rights. Legal frameworks worldwide recognize these freedoms; for example, data protection laws like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) give individuals more control over their personal information, reinforcing their freedom from unwarranted surveillance or data misuse. In practice, this means AI systems should be designed to empower users—allowing people to access information, form opinions, and make choices without being manipulated or unjustly restricted by algorithms.  

---

Disclaimer: Our global network of contributors to the AI & Human Rights Index is currently writing these articles and glossary entries. This particular page is currently in the recruitment and research stage. Please return later to see where this page is in the editorial workflow. Thank you! We look forward to learning with and from you.

of thought, conscience and religion;

(viii) The right to Freedom

Freedom means having the autonomy to make choices and act without undue interference or coercion from others. In the context of artificial intelligence (AI) and human rights, it highlights each person’s right to self-determination and control over their own life and personal data, even as AI systems increasingly influence our daily decisions. Freedom is a cornerstone of human rights and a foundational principle in AI ethics, ensuring that technology upholds individual autonomy rather than undermining it. The rise of AI has a direct impact on fundamental freedoms—from freedom of expression online to the right to privacy—making it crucial that AI is developed and used in ways that respect and protect these rights. Legal frameworks worldwide recognize these freedoms; for example, data protection laws like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) give individuals more control over their personal information, reinforcing their freedom from unwarranted surveillance or data misuse. In practice, this means AI systems should be designed to empower users—allowing people to access information, form opinions, and make choices without being manipulated or unjustly restricted by algorithms.  

---

Disclaimer: Our global network of contributors to the AI & Human Rights Index is currently writing these articles and glossary entries. This particular page is currently in the recruitment and research stage. Please return later to see where this page is in the editorial workflow. Thank you! We look forward to learning with and from you.

of opinion and expression;

(e) Economic, social and cultural rights, in particular:

(v) The right to education and training;

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) #

G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 999 U.N.T.S. 171 (Dec. 16, 1966)

Article 27

In those States in which ethnic, religious or linguistic minorities exist, persons belonging to such minorities shall not be denied the right, in community with the other members of their group, to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practise their own religion, or to use their own language.

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) #

G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 993 U.N.T.S. 3 (Dec. 16, 1966)

Article 13

1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to education. They agree that education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and the sense of its Dignity

Human dignity refers to the inherent worth and respect that every individual possesses, irrespective of their status, identity, or achievements. In the context of artificial intelligence (AI), dignity emphasizes the need for AI systems to be designed, developed, and deployed in ways that respect, preserve, and even enhance this intrinsic human value. While many existing AI ethics guidelines reference dignity, they often leave it undefined, highlighting instead its close relationship to human rights and its role in avoiding harm, forced acceptance, automated classification, and unconsented interactions between humans and AI. Fundamentally, dignity serves as a cornerstone of ethical AI practices, requiring systems to prioritize human well-being and autonomy. The preservation of dignity in AI systems places significant ethical responsibilities on developers, organizations, and policymakers. Developers play a pivotal role in ensuring that AI technologies respect privacy and autonomy by safeguarding personal data and avoiding manipulative practices. Bias mitigation is another critical responsibility, as AI systems must strive to eliminate discriminatory outcomes that could undermine the dignity of individuals based on race, gender, age, or other characteristics. Furthermore, transparency and accountability in AI operations are essential for upholding dignity, as they provide mechanisms to understand and address the impacts of AI systems on individuals and communities. Governance and legislation are equally important in safeguarding human dignity in the AI landscape. New legal frameworks and regulations can mandate ethical development and deployment practices, with a focus on protecting human rights and dignity. Government-issued technical and methodological guidelines can provide developers with clear standards for ethical AI design. Additionally, international cooperation is essential to establish a unified, global approach to AI ethics, recognizing the cross-border implications of AI technologies. By embedding dignity into AI systems and governance structures, society can ensure that AI technologies respect and enhance human worth, fostering trust, equity, and ethical innovation.   Recommended Reading Anna Jobin, Marcello Ienca, and Effy Vayena. "The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines." Nature Machine Intelligence 1 (2019): 389–399.    

---

Disclaimer: Our global network of contributors to the AI & Human Rights Index is currently writing these articles and glossary entries. This particular page is currently in the recruitment and research stage. Please return later to see where this page is in the editorial workflow. Thank you! We look forward to learning with and from you.

, and shall strengthen the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. They further agree that education shall enable all persons to participate effectively in a free society, promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations and all racial, ethnic or religious groups, and further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.

2. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize that, with a view to achieving the full realization of this right:

(a) Primary education shall be compulsory and available free to all;

(b) Secondary education in its different forms, including technical and vocational secondary education, shall be made generally available and accessible to all by every appropriate means, and in particular by the progressive introduction of free education;

(c) Higher education shall be made equally accessible to all, on the basis of capacity, by every appropriate means, and in particular by the progressive introduction of free education;

(d) Fundamental education shall be encouraged or intensified as far as possible for those persons who have not received or completed the whole period of their primary education;

(e) The development of a system of schools at all levels shall be actively pursued, an adequate fellowship system shall be established, and the material conditions of teaching staff shall be continuously improved.

3. The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians to choose for their children schools, other than those established by the public authorities, which conform to such minimum educational standards as may be laid down or approved by the State and to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions.

4. No part of this article shall be construed so as to interfere with the liberty of individuals and bodies to establish and direct educational institutions, subject always to the observance of the principles set forth in paragraph I of this article and to the requirement that the education given in such institutions shall conform to such minimum standards as may be laid down by the State.

Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) #

G.A. Res. 44/25, Convention on the Rights of the Child, U.N. Doc. A/RES/44/25 (Nov. 20, 1989)

Article 29

1. States Parties agree that the education of the child shall be directed to:

(a) The development of the child’s personality, talents and mental and physical abilities to their fullest potential;

(b) The development of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and for the principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations;

(c) The development of respect for the child’s parents, his or her own cultural identity, language and values, for the national values of the country in which the child is living, the country from which he or she may originate, and for civilizations different from his or her own;

Article 30

In those States in which ethnic, religious or linguistic minorities or persons of indigenous origin exist, a child belonging to such a minority or who is indigenous shall not be denied the right, in community with other members of his or her group, to enjoy his or her own culture, to profess and practise his or her own religion, or to use his or her own language.

Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities (1992) #

G.A. Res. 47/135, Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities, U.N. Doc. A/RES/47/135 (Dec. 18, 1992)

Article 1

1. States shall protect the existence and the national or ethnic, cultural, religious and linguistic identity of minorities within their respective territories and shall encourage conditions for the promotion of that identity.
2. States shall adopt appropriate legislative and other measures to achieve those ends.

Article 2

1. Persons belonging to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities (hereinafter referred to as persons belonging to minorities) have the right to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practise their own religion, and to use their own language, in private and in public, freely and without interference or any form of discrimination.

Article 4

1. States shall take measures to create favourable conditions to enable persons belonging to minorities to express their characteristics and to develop their culture, language, religion, traditions and customs, except where specific practices are in violation of national law and contrary to international standards.
2. States should take appropriate measures so that, wherever possible, persons belonging to minorities may have adequate opportunities to learn their mother tongue or to have instruction in their mother tongue.
3. States should, where appropriate, take measures in the field of education, in order to encourage knowledge of the history, traditions, language and culture of the minorities existing within their territory. Persons belonging to minorities should have adequate opportunities to gain knowledge of the society as a whole.
4. States should consider appropriate measures so that persons belonging to minorities may participate fully in the economic progress and development in their country.

UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) #

G.A. Res. 61/295, United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, U.N. Doc. A/RES/61/295 (Sept. 13, 2007)

Article 13

1. Indigenous peoples have the right to revitalize, use, develop and transmit to future generations their histories, languages, oral traditions, philosophies, writing systems and literatures, and to designate and retain their own names for communities, places and persons.

2. States shall take effective measures to ensure that this right is protected and also to ensure that indigenous peoples can understand and be understood in political, legal and administrative proceedings, where necessary through the provision of interpretation or by other appropriate means.

Article 14

1. Indigenous peoples have the right to establish and Control

Fjeld, Achten, Hilligoss, Nagy, Srikumar write, “Control over the use of data” as a principle stands for the notion that data subjects should have some degree of influence over how and why information about them is used. Certain other principles under the privacy theme, including “consent,” “ability to restrict processing,” “right to rectification,” and “right to erasure” can be thought of as more specific instantiations of the control principle since they are mechanisms by which a data subject might exert control. Perhaps because this principle functions as a higher-level articulation, many of the documents we coded under it are light in the way of definitions for “control.” Citation Fjeld, Jessica, Nele Achten, Hannah Hilligoss, Adam Nagy, and Madhulika Srikumar. “Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI.” Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, Research Publication No. 2020-1. January 15, 2020.  

---

Disclaimer: Our global network of contributors to the AI & Human Rights Index is currently writing these articles and glossary entries. This particular page is currently in the recruitment and research stage. Please return later to see where this page is in the editorial workflow. Thank you! We look forward to learning with and from you.

their educational systems and institutions providing education in their own languages, in a manner appropriate to their cultural methods of teaching and learning.

2. Indigenous individuals, particularly children, have the right to all levels and forms of education of the State without discrimination.

3. States shall, in conjunction with indigenous peoples, take effective measures, in order for indigenous individuals, particularly children, including those living outside their communities, to have access, when possible, to an education in their own culture and provided in their own language.